Essure removal surgery: Are preoperative transvaginal ultrasound and pelvic X-ray necessary?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was twofold. (1) To investigate the predictive characteristics of transvaginal ultrasonography for hysteroscopy necessity in Essure removal surgery. (2) To investigate the additional predictive value of a preoperative pelvic radiograph to transvaginal ultrasonography for hysteroscopy necessity. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study, performed in an academic and a non-academic teaching hospital in the Netherlands. 71 women who underwent Essure removal surgery with a perioperative hysteroscopy and who had a preoperative pelvic X-ray and transvaginal ultrasound were included. Four experts first predicted hysteroscopy necessity based on transvaginal ultrasound description and secondly based on transvaginal ultrasound combined with the preoperative pelvic radiograph. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the predictive tests were calculated. RESULTS: Based on transvaginal ultrasound, the mean predictive characteristics for experts were: sensitivity 89.7% (range 66.7%-100%), specificity 37.4% (range 17.6%-67.7%), positive predictive value 18.8% (range 13.2%-29.5%) and negative predictive value 95.1% (range 86.1%-100%). After adding the pelvic radiograph to the transvaginal ultrasound descriptions, the results were: sensitivity 66.7% (range 53.3%-80%), specificity 72.6% (range 56%-97.3%), positive predictive value 23% (range 14.3%-26.9%) and negative predictive value 94.1 % (range 90.3%-98.4%). For three experts sensitivity decreased after adding the pelvic radiograph. For all experts specificity increased. CONCLUSION: It is difficult to preoperatively decide if the fourth marker of the Essure outer coil can be excised during hysteroscopy. The addition of pelvic radiography to transvaginal ultrasound is not beneficial. It is recommended to perform a hysteroscopy during Essure removal surgery.

Perioperative findings and complications in Essure® removal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze perioperative findings and complications in surgical removal of Essure® microinserts. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of 274 patients who underwent surgical removal of Essure® microinserts. Outcomes of the surgical procedures and complications were entered into a digital case report form (CRF) by the surgeon and registered in an online database. Results were analyzed through IBM SPSS Statistics using descriptive statistical methods. RESULTS: During laparoscopic inspection in 15.4 % of fallopian tubes (n = 80) a chicken wing sign (the fallopian tube folding over the most distal part of the microinsert) was seen. Partial tubal perforation and total tubal perforation with migration of the microinsert out of the fallopian tube were seen in respectively 1.9 % (n = 10) and 0.2 % (n = 1) of cases. The microinserts were removed by laparoscopic tubotomy and extraction, followed by bilateral salpingectomy in 91.2 % of cases. In 7.3 % of cases (n = 20) a hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy was performed for additional indications than solely Essure® removal. Four microinserts were taken out entirely by means of hysteroscopy (1.5 %). We did not see major surgery related complications, however we found a risk of minor complications during or after surgery of respectively 1.6 % (n = 4) and 3.9 % (n = 10). CONCLUSIONS: During laparoscopic inspection, abnormalities were seen in 22.8 % (n = 119) of fallopian tubes, of which the chicken wing sign was the most common. Partial and total tubal perforation with migration of the microinsert were rare. The complication rate of Essure® removal surgery in our prospective study is low and complications are minor, without any major complication. However, while counseling patients with a request for surgical removal of Essure® microinserts, these results should be mentioned.

Challenges in Removing the Essure® Device.

We present a case about Essure® removal surgery in which the third markers of the device have torn off. The woman needed a second surgery for complete removal of the devices. Fluoroscopy during surgery is a good method to visualize the lost fragments. With fluoroscopy, a hysterectomy is not needed for complete removal. It is important to understand the structure of the device and to be aware of the four radiopaque markers during surgery and their removal.

Removal of Essure Sterilization Devices: A Retrospective Cohort Study in the Netherlands.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To analyze short-term effectiveness and symptom resolution after surgical removal of Essure (Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany) sterilization devices. DESIGN: A single-center retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification III). SETTING: A large secondary care teaching hospital in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent surgical removal of Essure devices between January 2009 and December 2015. INTERVENTIONS: Surgical removal of Essure devices was predominantly performed by laparoscopic surgery. In the majority of patients, Essure devices were removed by performing bilateral salpingectomy (66.6%). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data regarding patient characteristics, symptoms, the insertion procedure, the removal procedure, results of the pathological assessment, and follow-up were extracted from patient files. A total of 93 patients had Essure devices removed in the selected period. The onset of symptoms after Essure sterilization was variable. The most frequently reported symptom was abdominal pain (69.9%) followed by lower back pain and fatigue. Most patients reported multiple symptoms; 39.8% of women reported complete relief of symptoms after removal surgery, whereas 15.1% did not notice any relief in symptoms. CONCLUSION: Six weeks after removal surgery, 39.8% of patients reported complete resolution of symptoms. Further research to reported symptoms after Essure sterilization and symptom resolution after removal surgery is necessary to inform both patients and gynecologists in order to make a well-considered decision about taking the risks of (major) surgery and the expected benefits of removal.